None
Saint Petersburg, Russia
No photos
The scent, unfortunately, disappointed. Watermelon and aquatic notes made it too artificial, and those are exactly the shades I don't like in perfumery. This perfume, alas, was no exception
The scent is really strange. For me, it reminds me of overripe peaches with added sugar and some kind of hairspray. It feels like it was sprayed in a closed room without windows. A bit poisonous and too intrusive, I can't say I liked it
The bottle is simply gorgeous, I held it in my hands, and it's truly impressive. The design is top-notch, and essentially, it's the same classic, just in a new guise. It's really nice to see such things )
The scent reminds me of vanilla caramel. Very girly and light, it just makes you want to flirt with it a little
Complete disappointment, simply unbearable! How could I have made such a mistake, I can't fathom. I studied the composition, talked to owners, and asked about the details. Ugh, I should have at least smelled it a little before buying! Expectations were not met at all. I wanted something classic and complex, but I got a fragrance that is completely uninteresting and outdated. It reminds me of powder that's been sitting in a closet for three years, old and unwanted. And the quality of that powder leaves much to be desired. <br><br>Sophia, why did you add so much iris root extract? It could have turned out to be something more exciting! The blend of aldehydes and iris roots simply kills the scent. There are no narcissus, roses, or jasmine here. Galbanum and ylang-ylang are also not detectable. Only aldehydes and moss, nothing else. What kind of multifacetedness can we even talk about? Notes that sound beautiful in other fragrances just hum here, drowning out everything else. I can't even believe this is a creation of Madame Grojsman!<br><br>Perhaps my bottle contained the lowest quality iris root extract. After a sharp start with aldehydic notes, only a crude root smell remains. No flowers, resins, or bergamot - nothing. The sillage consists of a monotonous root smell, other notes are undetectable. Longevity is good, but hardly pleasing. <br><br>This fragrance is only suitable for mature ladies who don't care what perfume they use. I can't imagine a young girl liking it. I wouldn't be surprised if Sophia Grojsman herself isn't thrilled with her creation. What delights are there here! Just roots. I'll have to give this bottle away 🎁
Even though milk is mentioned in the description, I don't smell it. The scent is sweet, more like a real vanilla symphony. It seems like this fragrance is made for kids. Little ones will surely like these notes, especially if their favorite cartoon character is nearby 🎈
The fragrance in this flower-decorated bottle just repeats the classic version. It's really well-chosen, since the scent is floral-honey, sweet, and with vanilla notes 🌸
Here you can publish articles about your favorite fragrances and share your thoughts and secrets for choosing and buying perfume
Join the Fragsi community and get access to all its features
Award information is loading.
Award information is loading.
What a cool scent! It's so creamy and sweet, just incredible! A real delight for the senses 😍
It brings back memories of the classic Nina. It's as if something has gone, and now only echoes remain. This fragrance seems to repeat it, but not in the same way as before