Create your profile!
Sign in or sign up to learn about new releases, interesting fragrances, reviews, and tips on choosing perfume.
Image
Kristina Chimineva

Kristina Chimineva

Kristina Chimineva
Newbie
Newbie
  • Status

    None

  • Country

    Moscow, Russia

  • Date of birth
  • Registration date
Current fragrance
Bottle photo Paco Rabanne Olympéa

Achievements

  • Registration
  • Любимец сообщества
  • Одобрено сообществом
  • Золотое перо Fragsi
  • Мастер писать статьи
  • Эксперт писать статьи
  • Любитель писать статьи
  • Мастер оставлять отзывы

Posts

Photo stream 0
Reviews 7
Comments 2
Articles 0
Image

There's nothing here yet :(

No photos

Kristina Chimineva
Kristina Chimineva Kristina Chimineva
5/5
5
To the fragrance: Angeline Fruit Explosion

I really liked the scent: soft, sweet, fruity-floral. There is something familiar about it, but the impression is pleasant. The only downside is that it lasts less than the others. It sits close to the skin after just two hours, although if you bring your nose close to the application spot, it still smells good

Reply Go
Kristina Chimineva
Kristina Chimineva Kristina Chimineva
5/5
5

The fragrance is clearly too predictable, like it's from a standard "about Russia" set. Funny, but here you can feel pine needles and greenery, intertwining with notes of tar and wood. It sounds quite natural, but at the same time a bit rough 😅

Reply Go
Kristina Chimineva
Kristina Chimineva Kristina Chimineva
4/5
4

I don't understand why anyone would consider single-note fragrances a bad thing. I'm not a perfume snob, and the cherry in this scent is perfectly normal. Honestly though, it's more like a mix of cherry and sweet cherry. For spring, yes, it works. You could even try it on a puffer jacket, maybe it'll play differently in winter

Reply Go
Kristina Chimineva
Kristina Chimineva Kristina Chimineva
4/5
4

The fragrance is more fruity than floral. Overall, quite pleasant, like all perfumes from Victoria's Secret. The longevity is decent, which is good. Sweetish, but fine in the heat too, it won't be irritating

Reply Go
Kristina Chimineva
Kristina Chimineva Kristina Chimineva
3/5
3

I can't say I noticed any difference from the classic version. It's all the same, from start to finish, nothing new is felt 🤔

Reply Go
Kristina Chimineva
Kristina Chimineva Kristina Chimineva
5/5
5
To the fragrance: Shiseido Ginza

The fragrance is interesting, of course, but I can't say it's really worthy. The bottle looks decent, but that doesn't save the situation. The florality is somehow prickly, irritating. Spring-like? I don't know, rather, just intrusive. It has longevity, but the sillage is too woody, like I'm stuck in a forest 😒

Reply Go
Kristina Chimineva
Kristina Chimineva Kristina Chimineva
3/5
3

This perfume didn't impress me at all. On one hand, it seems interesting, but its sharp smell just shocks me. It's like a bitterness. But its longevity is really top-notch. For its price category, it's simply excellent 👍

Reply Go
Reply to a comment by: Liza Suneikina, Deep Garden

Tuberose can be completely different. But this fragrance - it's just awful! You shouldn't make any judgments based on it at all. It reminds me of some cheap mass-market product!!!

Reply Go

Everywhere you look, all these 'provocateurs' have the same musk, as if they were all brewed in the same pot 😏

Reply Go
Image

There's nothing here yet :(

Here you can publish articles about your favorite fragrances and share your thoughts and secrets for choosing and buying perfume