None
Kazan, Russia
No photos
Light, tasty, with strawberry and citrus, then cedar and patchouli. Not flat, it develops. Summery, but also good in early autumn. Decent longevity, lasts a long time on clothes
The bottle definitely looks appealing, and the fragrance isn't bad either, but for me, it's overly sweet. The fragrance pyramid is impressive, but my nose only picks up candied almond, patchouli, and pear in syrup. Even sweet tooths would find this scent challenging )
For me, this fragrance is completely unexpressive, just like the previous version. The only thing that changed is the bright, rich flowers, especially ylang-ylang, which added a bit of loudness
I adore it when sweets are so rich! This fragrance is just a find: it's so thick and sweet, like nectar you want to feel again and again. The longevity and sillage are simply amazing, and its languid character adds a special zest. I literally fell in love with it! 😍
The bottle is simply gorgeous, and the scent is truly captivating. But the price, in my opinion, is too high. If it weren't for that, I'd consider buying it. The smell is very pleasant, with a light greenness and bitter-almond notes, adding a drop of honey. Yet it's not heavy, but rather light and fresh. There's an airiness to its sound, which makes it especially appealing
Not impressed, not as exciting as the classic at all. Too ordinary and predictable. The citruses are bitter, and the perfume's base reminds me of many mass-market fragrances 😒
The fragrance is clearly from the past, with a characteristic chypre rose and spicy accents of cardamom and coriander at the beginning. This rose isn't just a flower, it's a real thorn! And aldehydes add sharpness, sounding very old-fashioned
Here you can publish articles about your favorite fragrances and share your thoughts and secrets for choosing and buying perfume
Join the Fragsi community and get access to all its features
Award information is loading.
Award information is loading.
There's nothing here yet :(
No comments