None
Saint Petersburg, Russia
No photos
The fragrance is certainly interesting and beautiful, but the combination of lily, lotus, and lily of the valley is sometimes simply unbearable. There are times when you just want to escape from it. It's good that these flowers in the composition aren't too heavy, but it's still better not to risk overdoing the quantity
This fragrance evokes some melancholic memories for me. It reminds me of mulled wine, but something is missing, as if there's not enough warmth. The smell is sweetish, even too much so, but the wine notes are not felt. It's a pity that prolonged wear causes headaches. I had to part with it, I couldn't wear it
Oh, what kind of nonsense is this? Plum, and sugary plum at that? Seriously? Nothing special, just a bunch of fruits with passionfruit, and that's it. No originality, just a light scent, like someone poured rosé wine into a jar. Not impressive, honestly
Just got back from the store and decided to check the website to understand what kind of brand it was and what the pyramid of the fragrance I liked looked like. I was surprised to learn it was a perfume by Sarah Jessica Parker. In the perfume department, I didn't bother to decipher that abbreviation. Overall, the scent turned out to be very pleasant - a white floral eau de parfum with creamy coconut notes in a vanilla shell. Honestly, I even wanted to buy myself some Crush. I usually avoid celebrity perfumes, but this case surprised me
The fragrance is beautiful, of course, but the warmth of its scent leaves a mixed feeling. Rose in amber sounds deep, but sometimes it feels too intrusive. The femininity of the fragrance is certainly present, but the romantic image it creates isn't always pleasing. I wore it in autumn, and honestly, it reveals itself best during this time of year, but there's still some bitterness
The fragrance is beautiful, of course, but it's too rich and heavy. White flowers and spices, yes, are noticeable, but the chocolate-patchouli notes are overwhelming. It smells sweet, but this sweetness is more oppressive than joyful. I can't say it's gourmand, but I can't call it light either. Overall, it didn't impress me )
The fragrance is somewhat indistinct and rough, with an unclear sweetness. Yes, I agree it somewhat resembles a lighter version of Schweppes. But that one is at least bright and has character, while this one is chemical, but somehow too quiet
Here you can publish articles about your favorite fragrances and share your thoughts and secrets for choosing and buying perfume
Join the Fragsi community and get access to all its features
Award information is loading.
Award information is loading.
This is the 20th century. For me, it's just the past. Mom started using this fragrance when it first came out, and a couple of years later, she gave birth to me. When I got a little older, I constantl...